Home SECURITY Mintsifra introduces a new risk indicator for telecom operators

Mintsifra introduces a new risk indicator for telecom operators

Mintsifra introduces a new risk indicator for telecom operators


Mintsifra introduces a new risk indicator for telecom operators

Telecom operators must block prohibited sites, even if they have RKN black boxes installed.

Mintsifry proposed introduce a new indicator of the risk of operators violating the requirements of Roskomnadzor (RKN) – unblocked prohibited resources in the traffic of operators on whose networks technical means of countering threats (TSPU) are installed. This is reported in the reviews of representatives of the telecommunications industry. per project Order of the Ministry of Digital Development, published on the portal of draft regulatory legal acts.

TSPU is special equipment that the RKN installs and maintains on the networks of telecom operators under the law on the “sovereign Internet”, which entered into force on November 1, 2019. Operators are obliged to provide employees of the RKN with access to their networks and technical conditions for the placement of TSPU. This equipment allows you to filter traffic and block prohibited resources using DPI technology (deep filtering of traffic by packet content). Unofficially, TSPU are called “black boxes” from the RKN.

In addition, since 2012, the RKN has been maintaining the Unified Register of Prohibited Resources, where it enters sites with child pornography, information about drugs, methods of committing suicide, online casinos, extremist materials and other resources prohibited by the law on the protection of children. Operators are required to block all sites from this registry. However, installing TSPU on their networks relieves them of this responsibility.

For providing access to prohibited Internet resources, operators face fines from 500,000 to 1 million rubles for legal entities and imprisonment of up to three years for officials. It is also possible to initiate a criminal case for violations of the installation, operation, modernization of TSPU or for non-compliance with the technical conditions for their installation.

The law on the “sovereign Internet” removes the responsibility for non-blocking by providers only in the case of non-registry blocking carried out as part of the centralized management of addressing and routing in Runet using TSPU.

In responses to the draft order of the Ministry of Digital Development, RSPP, MKS, VimpelCom and Tele2 emphasize that the operator is not obliged to restrict access to information on the Internet in the presence of TSPU. This equipment controls the ILV, the telecom operator is not allowed to it. They demand that this risk indicator be removed from the draft order. Vimpelcom notes that unblocked prohibited sites when using TSPU through the fault of the telecom operator can actually arise in only one case – if the telecom operator does not ensure the passage of all traffic through TSPU.

In addition, experts believe that the new risk indicator from the Ministry of Digital Development is aimed at preventing violations by operators who may be trying to bypass the TSPU or send part of the traffic through alternative channels. They also believe that the Ministry of Digital Development wants to force operators to duplicate ILV blocking, since TSPU may work inefficiently or experience a shortage of equipment.

The Ministry of Digital Development noted that the new indicator will help the RKN to check telecom operators for which there is a risk of violating the requirement to pass traffic through TSPU: “Operators are required by law to do this. If the indicator fixes possible violations by operators, the RKN will take measures to check them. Incidents when operators did not redirect all traffic through TSPU were recorded, they are registered by the RKN.


Source link



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here